No, it makes her a character you care about in a dramatic story. 
I don't like to stick to superficial analyses of fiction. I enjoy it more if I go deeper than "yay, it's entertainment!"
Oh, sweet Odin's beard, that's not at all what I was doing. Why is it necessary for you to construct straw-man arguments in order to just disagree with me about a comic book?
Shit, if anything, I'm being a little more deep in my analysis than you are, since I haven't ever talked about her death as "just a plot development".
And I'm not sure how you can say that a plot development is "worth it" in a way that doesn't mean "it's justified." This is a semantic debate: I don't feel that plot development was worth it, and Alter didn't need yet another sin to make revenge against her more satisfying.
It's not even a semantic debate. You aren't sure how I can say X, I'm not sure how many more ways I can explain exactly what I mean when I say X. I suppose I can come up with another comical method, like the cave-man grunting, but what would be the point? You wouldn't get it, because you're not actually reading what I write.
I honestly don't
care if you disagree with me, especially considering that my original statement was nothing more than a personal opinion on the event in question, and had nothing to do with how you, yourself, "should" feel about it, but at least do me the courtesy, if you're going to repeatedly disagree with what I'm saying, to at least disagree with
what I'm actually saying, rather than a superficial and easily-dismissed misconstruction.
Thanks.